<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LogoWorks getting Dell&#039;d</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shopsavvy.mobi/2005/08/23/logoworks-getting-delld/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shopsavvy.mobi/2005/08/23/logoworks-getting-delld/</link>
	<description>Shopping. Improved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 23:14:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Von Glitschka</title>
		<link>http://shopsavvy.mobi/2005/08/23/logoworks-getting-delld/#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator>Von Glitschka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 06:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weblogswork.com/?p=208#comment-161</guid>
		<description>Logoworst.com is still up to it&#039;s lame modus operandi. If you google hard enough you&#039;ll find designers who work for them complaining about it. Whining that their art is being wasted, ripped off by other Logoworst.com artists and not paid well. Hard to feel their pain when it&#039;s self inflicted.

Logoworst.com has millions in venture capital to schmooze and woo major media venues and publications in order to give them a hardy thumbs up. Money talks and vicitmizing small business is profitable. Greed is the core motive.

The leaders in the communication arts industry don&#039;t care. They&#039;d rather wallow in pretentious self importance thinking their attention and design doesn&#039;t dwell on such gutter level clientele that chooses to use Logoworst.com. In their minds there is no problem, after all &#039;Nike&#039;, &#039;Pepsi&#039;, &#039;IBM&#039;, &#039;Insert Multi-national Corporation Name Here&#039; is what they choose to work with. Let the rest eat creative cake.

Too bad. The majority of design is produced for small to medium sized business not mega corps. But the our leaders are dwellers in major media markets and thus their mind set is focused on that at the expense of our industry. So like Logoworst.com it&#039;s just another form of greed driving decisions.

Thus it&#039;s upon designers to pursue creative excellence within their own realm of creative influence and raise the bar of the local design culture they live in and educate their client and work for them on a level that Logoworst.com simply cannot deliver on. Is it easy? No. Is it doable? Yes.

As for me and my firm we&#039;ll continue to create art that exceeds the production line methods, undercutting designers, unrealistic timelines and hacked uninspiring ideas produced by art farms such as Logoworst.com.....oh, excuse me.....I mean &#039;Logoworks.com&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Logoworst.com is still up to it&#8217;s lame modus operandi. If you google hard enough you&#8217;ll find designers who work for them complaining about it. Whining that their art is being wasted, ripped off by other Logoworst.com artists and not paid well. Hard to feel their pain when it&#8217;s self inflicted.</p>
<p>Logoworst.com has millions in venture capital to schmooze and woo major media venues and publications in order to give them a hardy thumbs up. Money talks and vicitmizing small business is profitable. Greed is the core motive.</p>
<p>The leaders in the communication arts industry don&#8217;t care. They&#8217;d rather wallow in pretentious self importance thinking their attention and design doesn&#8217;t dwell on such gutter level clientele that chooses to use Logoworst.com. In their minds there is no problem, after all &#8216;Nike&#8217;, &#8216;Pepsi&#8217;, &#8216;IBM&#8217;, &#8216;Insert Multi-national Corporation Name Here&#8217; is what they choose to work with. Let the rest eat creative cake.</p>
<p>Too bad. The majority of design is produced for small to medium sized business not mega corps. But the our leaders are dwellers in major media markets and thus their mind set is focused on that at the expense of our industry. So like Logoworst.com it&#8217;s just another form of greed driving decisions.</p>
<p>Thus it&#8217;s upon designers to pursue creative excellence within their own realm of creative influence and raise the bar of the local design culture they live in and educate their client and work for them on a level that Logoworst.com simply cannot deliver on. Is it easy? No. Is it doable? Yes.</p>
<p>As for me and my firm we&#8217;ll continue to create art that exceeds the production line methods, undercutting designers, unrealistic timelines and hacked uninspiring ideas produced by art farms such as Logoworst.com&#8230;..oh, excuse me&#8230;..I mean &#8216;Logoworks.com&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Von Glitschka</title>
		<link>http://shopsavvy.mobi/2005/08/23/logoworks-getting-delld/#comment-165</link>
		<dc:creator>Von Glitschka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 06:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weblogswork.com/?p=208#comment-165</guid>
		<description>Logoworst.com is still up to it&#039;s lame modus operandi. If you google hard enough you&#039;ll find designers who work for them complaining about it. Whining that their art is being wasted, ripped off by other Logoworst.com artists and not paid well. Hard to feel their pain when it&#039;s self inflicted.

Logoworst.com has millions in venture capital to schmooze and woo major media venues and publications in order to give them a hardy thumbs up. Money talks and vicitmizing small business is profitable. Greed is the core motive.

The leaders in the communication arts industry don&#039;t care. They&#039;d rather wallow in pretentious self importance thinking their attention and design doesn&#039;t dwell on such gutter level clientele that chooses to use Logoworst.com. In their minds there is no problem, after all &#039;Nike&#039;, &#039;Pepsi&#039;, &#039;IBM&#039;, &#039;Insert Multi-national Corporation Name Here&#039; is what they choose to work with. Let the rest eat creative cake.

Too bad. The majority of design is produced for small to medium sized business not mega corps. But the our leaders are dwellers in major media markets and thus their mind set is focused on that at the expense of our industry. So like Logoworst.com it&#039;s just another form of greed driving decisions.

Thus it&#039;s upon designers to pursue creative excellence within their own realm of creative influence and raise the bar of the local design culture they live in and educate their client and work for them on a level that Logoworst.com simply cannot deliver on. Is it easy? No. Is it doable? Yes.

As for me and my firm we&#039;ll continue to create art that exceeds the production line methods, undercutting designers, unrealistic timelines and hacked uninspiring ideas produced by art farms such as Logoworst.com.....oh, excuse me.....I mean &#039;Logoworks.com&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Logoworst.com is still up to it&#8217;s lame modus operandi. If you google hard enough you&#8217;ll find designers who work for them complaining about it. Whining that their art is being wasted, ripped off by other Logoworst.com artists and not paid well. Hard to feel their pain when it&#8217;s self inflicted.</p>
<p>Logoworst.com has millions in venture capital to schmooze and woo major media venues and publications in order to give them a hardy thumbs up. Money talks and vicitmizing small business is profitable. Greed is the core motive.</p>
<p>The leaders in the communication arts industry don&#8217;t care. They&#8217;d rather wallow in pretentious self importance thinking their attention and design doesn&#8217;t dwell on such gutter level clientele that chooses to use Logoworst.com. In their minds there is no problem, after all &#8216;Nike&#8217;, &#8216;Pepsi&#8217;, &#8216;IBM&#8217;, &#8216;Insert Multi-national Corporation Name Here&#8217; is what they choose to work with. Let the rest eat creative cake.</p>
<p>Too bad. The majority of design is produced for small to medium sized business not mega corps. But the our leaders are dwellers in major media markets and thus their mind set is focused on that at the expense of our industry. So like Logoworst.com it&#8217;s just another form of greed driving decisions.</p>
<p>Thus it&#8217;s upon designers to pursue creative excellence within their own realm of creative influence and raise the bar of the local design culture they live in and educate their client and work for them on a level that Logoworst.com simply cannot deliver on. Is it easy? No. Is it doable? Yes.</p>
<p>As for me and my firm we&#8217;ll continue to create art that exceeds the production line methods, undercutting designers, unrealistic timelines and hacked uninspiring ideas produced by art farms such as Logoworst.com&#8230;..oh, excuse me&#8230;..I mean &#8216;Logoworks.com&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cat</title>
		<link>http://shopsavvy.mobi/2005/08/23/logoworks-getting-delld/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator>Cat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 05:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weblogswork.com/?p=208#comment-160</guid>
		<description>Von&#039;s response to Jeff Kearl&#039;s comments are above, but somehow Jeff&#039;s comments have been deleted.

I&#039;m sure it&#039;s still in cache, but let me help you out ....

&quot;They are malicious ... all of those postings are written by a handful of designers that resent our business model. They feel we are devaluing the graphic design industry because we charge so little for what we do. Our model is disruptive ... a small number of graphic designers donâ€™t see it this way and are trying to blog us to death. They are malicious.â€?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Von&#8217;s response to Jeff Kearl&#8217;s comments are above, but somehow Jeff&#8217;s comments have been deleted.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s still in cache, but let me help you out &#8230;.</p>
<p>&#8220;They are malicious &#8230; all of those postings are written by a handful of designers that resent our business model. They feel we are devaluing the graphic design industry because we charge so little for what we do. Our model is disruptive &#8230; a small number of graphic designers donâ€™t see it this way and are trying to blog us to death. They are malicious.â€?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cat</title>
		<link>http://shopsavvy.mobi/2005/08/23/logoworks-getting-delld/#comment-164</link>
		<dc:creator>Cat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 05:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weblogswork.com/?p=208#comment-164</guid>
		<description>Von&#039;s response to Jeff Kearl&#039;s comments are above, but somehow Jeff&#039;s comments have been deleted.

I&#039;m sure it&#039;s still in cache, but let me help you out ....

&quot;They are malicious ... all of those postings are written by a handful of designers that resent our business model. They feel we are devaluing the graphic design industry because we charge so little for what we do. Our model is disruptive ... a small number of graphic designers donâ€™t see it this way and are trying to blog us to death. They are malicious.â€?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Von&#8217;s response to Jeff Kearl&#8217;s comments are above, but somehow Jeff&#8217;s comments have been deleted.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s still in cache, but let me help you out &#8230;.</p>
<p>&#8220;They are malicious &#8230; all of those postings are written by a handful of designers that resent our business model. They feel we are devaluing the graphic design industry because we charge so little for what we do. Our model is disruptive &#8230; a small number of graphic designers donâ€™t see it this way and are trying to blog us to death. They are malicious.â€?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Von Glitschka</title>
		<link>http://shopsavvy.mobi/2005/08/23/logoworks-getting-delld/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>Von Glitschka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 08:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weblogswork.com/?p=208#comment-159</guid>
		<description>Jeff,

You have every right to run your business any way you see fit. No one is disputing that at all. We have every right to point out the under-cutting tactics and flawed methodology that a 72hr, $300 dollar logo produces.

Blog to death? It&#039;s called free speech my friend.

I find it ironic you say one thing to me privately in an email and something totally different in public? Disagree with me if you want but your not going to find my opinion wavering regardless if it&#039;s a public post or private email.

Happy waffling Jeff.

Von</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff,</p>
<p>You have every right to run your business any way you see fit. No one is disputing that at all. We have every right to point out the under-cutting tactics and flawed methodology that a 72hr, $300 dollar logo produces.</p>
<p>Blog to death? It&#8217;s called free speech my friend.</p>
<p>I find it ironic you say one thing to me privately in an email and something totally different in public? Disagree with me if you want but your not going to find my opinion wavering regardless if it&#8217;s a public post or private email.</p>
<p>Happy waffling Jeff.</p>
<p>Von</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Von Glitschka</title>
		<link>http://shopsavvy.mobi/2005/08/23/logoworks-getting-delld/#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator>Von Glitschka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 08:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weblogswork.com/?p=208#comment-163</guid>
		<description>Jeff,

You have every right to run your business any way you see fit. No one is disputing that at all. We have every right to point out the under-cutting tactics and flawed methodology that a 72hr, $300 dollar logo produces.

Blog to death? It&#039;s called free speech my friend.

I find it ironic you say one thing to me privately in an email and something totally different in public? Disagree with me if you want but your not going to find my opinion wavering regardless if it&#039;s a public post or private email.

Happy waffling Jeff.

Von</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff,</p>
<p>You have every right to run your business any way you see fit. No one is disputing that at all. We have every right to point out the under-cutting tactics and flawed methodology that a 72hr, $300 dollar logo produces.</p>
<p>Blog to death? It&#8217;s called free speech my friend.</p>
<p>I find it ironic you say one thing to me privately in an email and something totally different in public? Disagree with me if you want but your not going to find my opinion wavering regardless if it&#8217;s a public post or private email.</p>
<p>Happy waffling Jeff.</p>
<p>Von</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weblogs Work &#187; Weblogs Work for LogoWorks (thanks Jeff)</title>
		<link>http://shopsavvy.mobi/2005/08/23/logoworks-getting-delld/#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>Weblogs Work &#187; Weblogs Work for LogoWorks (thanks Jeff)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2005 17:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weblogswork.com/?p=208#comment-158</guid>
		<description>[...] &#160; Now, if they would only implement some of my ideas.&#160; Here is a follow-up to my previous post regarding the LogoWorks refund policy: 	Alex, 	I&#8217;m sorry for the confusion. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &nbsp; Now, if they would only implement some of my ideas.&nbsp; Here is a follow-up to my previous post regarding the LogoWorks refund policy: 	Alex, 	I&rsquo;m sorry for the confusion. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weblogs Work &#187; Weblogs Work for LogoWorks (thanks Jeff)</title>
		<link>http://shopsavvy.mobi/2005/08/23/logoworks-getting-delld/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>Weblogs Work &#187; Weblogs Work for LogoWorks (thanks Jeff)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2005 17:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weblogswork.com/?p=208#comment-162</guid>
		<description>[...] &#160; Now, if they would only implement some of my ideas.&#160; Here is a follow-up to my previous post regarding the LogoWorks refund policy: 	Alex, 	I&#8217;m sorry for the confusion. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &nbsp; Now, if they would only implement some of my ideas.&nbsp; Here is a follow-up to my previous post regarding the LogoWorks refund policy: 	Alex, 	I&rsquo;m sorry for the confusion. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

